Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:19:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:19:15 -0500 Received: from hq.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.197]:64004 "EHLO hq.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:19:13 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 07:16:39 -0700 From: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com To: Marian Jancar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Message-ID: <20020114071639.A22353@hq.fsmlabs.com> In-Reply-To: <20020112121315.B1482@inspiron.school.suse.de> <20020112160714.A10847@planetzork.spacenet> <3C42BEA1.6080302@nmskb.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3C42BEA1.6080302@nmskb.cz>; from jancar@nmskb.cz on Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 12:18:57PM +0100 Organization: FSM Labs Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 12:18:57PM +0100, Marian Jancar wrote: > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > >I'd like to add my 'me too' to those who have requested a re-run of this test, building > >the *identical* kernel tree every time, starting from the same initial conditions. > >Maybe that's what you did, but it's not clear from your post. > > > > Its obvious its same source code under different kernels. It would have > no sense to do othervise and it would require more effort than just boot > other image and run same script. It's a different tree each time. Same contents. Different tree. -- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/