Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755356AbYCXXz5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:55:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753305AbYCXXzo (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:55:44 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.235]:10680 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753016AbYCXXzn (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:55:43 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mGqzBtrjXht/mpnAfQvSmiBHTFQVGMI7jUCmU/rHGzOveOc0vzEIKcrGrEXFboilKYrNLaiMuMgIyV+OpcRP8v4k/gZO65yzyq61f9gx2SxIy+uytUB41mbPEytbEe/K6T523tK4/nA2enKjCF4wb/F+YLozTyWlttXoePLqiKE= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:55:39 +0000 From: "Catalin Marinas" To: "Junio C Hamano" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2 Cc: "Rene Herman" , "Jan Engelhardt" , git , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Josef Sipek" In-Reply-To: <7vlk47ua3v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47E81037.5030808@keyaccess.nl> <7vlk47ua3v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1642 Lines: 35 On 24/03/2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Rene Herman writes: > > And I remember some mumblings about git growing quilt-like > > functionality itself. Anything on that? > > > Not my mumbling, but I am quite open to slurp in guilt as a subdirectory > in git.git at some point in the future just like we bundle git-gui and > gitk if asked by the maintainer. > > The same applies to StGIT for that matter, although I somehow feel that is > much less likely to happen, because it lived long enough as a standalone > project with enough following to achieve sustainable momentum by itself. Indeed, StGIT has grown quite a lot (it now has ~45 commands) and it probably feels better as a tool on its own. However, I think it would be good for git to get such functionality (and it could even share some ideas StGIT and guilt). If this functionality will get fully integrated in git, StGIT could use it directly rather than the low-level git commands. An example of additional functionality that might stay outside of git (at least for a while): since basic patch management support is pretty much complete in StGIT, a feature we are thinking about adding is better support for patch sharing between developers (or repositories/branches). This should allow easier cloning and merging with branches that have a volatile history at the top. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/