Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:44:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:44:12 -0500 Received: from sun.fadata.bg ([80.72.64.67]:15373 "HELO fadata.bg") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:43:59 -0500 To: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com Cc: Daniel Phillips , Arjan van de Ven , Roman Zippel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable In-Reply-To: <3C41A545.A903F24C@linux-m68k.org> <20020113153602.GA19130@fenrus.demon.nl> <20020113223438.A19324@hq.fsmlabs.com> <87bsfx9led.fsf@fadata.bg> <20020114064548.D22065@hq.fsmlabs.com> From: Momchil Velikov In-Reply-To: <20020114064548.D22065@hq.fsmlabs.com> Date: 14 Jan 2002 18:36:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87k7ukyjme.fsf@fadata.bg> Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "yodaiken" == yodaiken writes: yodaiken> current scheme, this becomes more complex. And with preempt, you cannot even offer the yodaiken> assurance that once a process gets the cpu it will make _any_ advance at all. So? It either shouldn't have got the CPU anyway (maybe it CPU is needed for other things) or user's priority setup is seriously borked. The scheduling policies, algorithms, mechanisms, whatever ... do not guarantee schedulability by themselves. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/