To: Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com>
Cc: Michael Meyer <mike65134@yahoo.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"
References: <16336.23884.qm@web25814.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
	<20080325140825.GA19722@bit.office.eurotux.com>
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date: 25 Mar 2008 18:16:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20080325140825.GA19722@bit.office.eurotux.com>
Message-ID: <87abkmhgg0.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1049
Lines: 24

Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Michael Meyer wrote:
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > what is the difference between booting a dual core
> > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating the second
> > core at run time with "echo 0 >
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"?
> 
> maxcpus=1 should turn off the SMP alternative and switch to UP only,
> optimising some locks and instructions.

CPU hot unplug will do the same. But it is unlikely it accounts
for that much performance difference.

If he used maxcpus=0 it would make sense. maxcpus=0 disables
the IO-APIC which likely makes a large difference. But it should
be actually slower.

There should be actually no difference in theory between max_cpus=1
and hot unplug to one CPU. Might be some bug.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/