Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:14:23 -0500
From: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
To: jes@sgi.com, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV
Message-ID: <20080325201423.GB4446@sgi.com>
References: <20080325192524.343385569@attica.americas.sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080325192524.343385569@attica.americas.sgi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1035
Lines: 24

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:25:24PM -0500, dcn@sgi.com wrote:
> This set of five patches moves XPC and XPNET to drivers/misc/xp in preparation
> for enabling X86_64 support.

It looks like the 2nd patch of this set has been blocked from the mailing
list because of its size. At least that's my assumption. The size of the
five patches are as follows (listed in patch order):

 -rw-r--r-- 1 dcn os1   4880 2008-03-25 14:05 uncached-pages
 -rw-r--r-- 1 dcn os1 471050 2008-03-25 14:10 move-xp
 -rw-r--r-- 1 dcn os1 203046 2008-03-25 14:14 generic-xp
 -rw-r--r-- 1 dcn os1 163868 2008-03-25 14:17 Lindent
 -rw-r--r-- 1 dcn os1  49723 2008-03-25 14:46 checkpatch.pl

The missing patch moved XPC and XPNET from arch/ia64/sn to drivers/misc/xp.
How should such a patch be submitted?

Thanks,
Dean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/