Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20080325.160916.182495221.davem@davemloft.net>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: jirislaby@gmail.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, joe@perches.com,
       tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 109/148] include/asm-x86/serial.h: checkpatch cleanups
 - formatting only
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080325131708.GB9612@elte.hu>
References: <20080325084457.GA32103@elte.hu>
	<20080325.024204.175042056.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20080325131708.GB9612@elte.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 756
Lines: 18

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:17:08 +0100

> There can be fluctuations and artifacts, and obviously this is just 
> another (arbitrary) static metric that has no forced relationship with 
> real code quality - but in my experience it's surprisingly close to 
> reality - closer than any other code metric i've seen.

And yet you used it to claim that the sparc64 port is an
unmaintainable pile of poo.

Thanks but no thanks, you just proved even more to me why
checkpatch is crap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/