Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758179AbYCZK44 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:56:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753984AbYCZK4r (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:56:47 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:48967 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753536AbYCZK4q (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:56:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:56:28 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: David Miller Cc: joern@logfs.org, jirislaby@gmail.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, joe@perches.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 109/148] include/asm-x86/serial.h: checkpatch cleanups - formatting only Message-ID: <20080326105628.GC17176@elte.hu> References: <20080325131258.GC11359@logfs.org> <20080325133810.GA10044@elte.hu> <20080325134556.GA10424@elte.hu> <20080325.161142.65862968.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080325.161142.65862968.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1880 Lines: 43 * David Miller wrote: > From: Ingo Molnar > Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:45:56 +0100 > > > and let me give an example with the your very own code that you wrote > > and maintain, drivers/mtd/devices/block2mtd.c: > > > > errors lines of code errors/KLOC > > drivers/mtd/devices/block2mtd.c 10 490 20.4 > > Ingo, this is devolving into a "code I maintain is great, code you > maintain sucks, checkpatch says so" kind of discussion, please stop. Firstly, had you read my previous mails you'd realize that a score of 20.4 errors/KLOC is pretty clean code for a driver. (and a manual view of drivers/mtd/devices/block2mtd.c confirmed that first quick impression.) Secondly, it was you who claimed that checkpatch.pl warnings were bogus, i asked for hard data which you refused to provide, so i had to come up with examples to counter that. What did you expect me to express my checkpatch.pl experience about, if not about code that i maintain? How did you expect me to show to you that the warnings are correct, if not code that you maintain? Why should i talk about any code that neither you nor i am directly interested in? Do you want me to talk about FreeBSD, so that i dont hurt anyone's feelings? Feel free to use my code as an example to make your points. > You're not making any friends by making your arguments this way. just to make it clear, i'm not here on lkml to "make friends", i'm here to make Linux better. The two goals are not fundamentally incompatible but sometimes they do clash ;-) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/