Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759436AbYC0Spv (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:45:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758426AbYC0Spm (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:45:42 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:58265 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755133AbYC0Spl (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:45:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:43:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Ingo Molnar cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [x86] Stricter check in follow_huge_addr() In-Reply-To: <20080327081318.GA15626@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20080327081318.GA15626@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 542 Lines: 14 On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > btw., what type of real-life problem does this address? Did this trigger > somewhere? (if yes, do you have any URLs i could put into the > changelog?) Does not address any issues. I just saw it on review while thinking about how to optimize checks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/