Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:44:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:43:04 -0500 Received: from bazooka.saturnus.vein.hu ([193.6.40.86]:26599 "EHLO bazooka.saturnus.vein.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:42:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:42:03 +0100 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: slowdown with new scheduler. Message-ID: <20020114214203.A387@bazooka.saturnus.vein.hu> In-Reply-To: <20020114124541.A32412@suse.de> <20020114172010.GA173@elfie.cavy.de> <20020114192925.GA4441@elfie.cavy.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020114192925.GA4441@elfie.cavy.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i From: Banai Zoltan Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 08:29:25PM +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On Mon Jan 14 2002, Heinz Diehl wrote: > > > 2.4.18-pre3 real 7m55.243s > > user 6m34.080s > > sys 0m27.610s > > > > 2.4.18-pre+H7 real 7m35.962s > > user 6m34.270s > > sys 0m27.700s > > > > 2.4.18-pre3-ac2 real 7m39.203s > > user 6m34.110s > > sys 0m28.740s > > > > 2.4.18-pre3+H7+preempt-rml real 6m58.983s > user 6m34.500s > sys 0m27.820s > That sounds very good! But what about the VM code? Is the VM in 2.4.18-pre3+H7 as good as in 2.4.18-pre2aa2? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/