Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756792AbYC1Tcn (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:32:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753865AbYC1Tcf (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:32:35 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:40582 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752307AbYC1Tce (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:32:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:32:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Christoph Lameter cc: Pekka Enberg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pawel Staszewski , LKML , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Natalie Protasevich Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200803272353.51901.rjw@sisk.pl> <84144f020803281015s60370d9dpec0913c33004b6c2@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LFD 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 701 Lines: 24 On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > __GFP_ZERO is cleared in one place when new_slab() calls allocate_slab(). You're so full of crap that it's not even funny. The fact that one path does it correct makes it ok to do it wrong in another path? > The fallback code in 2.6.25 will go away in 2.6.26. And the fact that 2.5.26 may fix it differently makes it ok to be buggy in 2.6.25? You are not making any sense what-so-ever. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/