Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756787AbYC1Tom (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:44:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754242AbYC1Tod (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:44:33 -0400 Received: from smtp120.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.93]:26985 "HELO smtp120.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754233AbYC1Toc (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:44:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=qdXDtw5eZiJ5uW7ykQsbY0WNLl9cvbdt3AJHFMaYMVS1xLuoapA3YlFruqrqBwQY7j6d0jBfbEQ/uEr79/QQNmFWFED00UHDotV2tvM8PziSbA6aWL3yXth0rhMHhS4o6tXmDQEnL90aq7BaJrbuU0J1+A1wKPerUfOVi3XdFsM= ; X-YMail-OSG: r.d2a9sVM1nzctbMSEINOb5wxQQXZ_dmguIXReMeNyh.bD_083fAJTIWb8PjfzjUM08OSpIsag-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Subject: Re: 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:44:26 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Len Brown" References: <20080322202454.9D69DCC0EF@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> <200803281201.54380.david-b@pacbell.net> <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEC83CDD@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEC83CDD@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803281244.27012.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1101 Lines: 30 On Friday 28 March 2008, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > >> > I noticed this with 2.6.25-rc2 (if not before), and the problem > >> > is still there with 2.6.25-rc6-git (as of this AM). > > > >A 2.6.24 kernel I still had stashed away didn't act odd; the > >problem joined us before 2.6.25-rc1 was tagged. > > > > There was a fix that went in recently (one or two days back) that should > have fixed this. > Commit 8e92b6605da989 > > Can you check with latest git to see whether this is still a problem? The problem is still there in GIT as of this morning, which includes 8e92b6605da989 ... Comments on why bc71bec91f9875ef825d12104acf3bf4ca215fa4 seems to be causing this? I think it's just bad reports getting to userspace, rather than an actual 120K wakeups/second. (The report is of course not always 120K, but it's usually in that range.) - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/