Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758433AbYC1X4l (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:56:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756526AbYC1X4c (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:56:32 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:16634 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756330AbYC1X4b convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:56:31 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,573,1199692800"; d="scan'208";a="362450953" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:51:57 -0700 Message-ID: <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEC83EF5@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <200803281636.04029.david-b@pacbell.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec Thread-Index: AciRLTiSpX2UrFAkSNqRNHbqThyYbQAANYAQ References: <20080322202454.9D69DCC0EF@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> <200803281509.23107.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080328225604.GA7136@linux-os.sc.intel.com> <200803281636.04029.david-b@pacbell.net> From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" To: "David Brownell" Cc: "Andrew Morton" , , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , , "Len Brown" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Mar 2008 23:49:54.0268 (UTC) FILETIME=[6BC561C0:01C8912E] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1419 Lines: 41 >-----Original Message----- >From: David Brownell [mailto:david-b@pacbell.net] >Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:36 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Rafael J. >Wysocki; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Len Brown >Subject: Re: 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec > >On Friday 28 March 2008, Venki Pallipadi wrote: > >> I think I figured out the bug... >> >> Can you try the below patch and confirm that it works (over >upstream - ignore >> the earlier revert patch I sent to you). > >That seems to do the job ... thanks! One more regression >fixed, it feels like RC7 is almost done. :) > >It still says odd things about C0 vs C1 though: powertop >says 100% of the time is in C0, but this patch would seem >to be irrelevant if that were true. > Great! 100% C0 is not real reading. The problem behind that is there is no wat to measure exact C1 idle time with halt based C1s. So, we always used to report 0 time in acpi and that's what is reported by powertop. This should be fixed in future, as we now export approx time (even though not exact) in cpuidle and powertop is about to start using it. Thanks, Venki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/