Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753139AbYC2Mzb (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:55:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751379AbYC2MzW (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:55:22 -0400 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:36180 "EHLO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751345AbYC2MzV (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:55:21 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: X6X8Hwop7RDD6KkGR6sOSRw8YxyT86IcGRvpUbA9jjLU 1206795319 Message-ID: <47EE3C29.2010908@imap.cc> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:55:05 +0100 From: Tilman Schmidt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Brownell CC: Ingo Molnar , Mark Lord , David Miller , jkosina@suse.cz, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Kconfig RTC selection References: <20080327160700.GB828@suse.de> <200803280249.42193.david-b@pacbell.net> <47ECE9BB.3050006@imap.cc> <200803281222.33648.david-b@pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <200803281222.33648.david-b@pacbell.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig79772E66E538CF11D4966586" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1649 Lines: 44 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig79772E66E538CF11D4966586 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:22:32 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 28 March 2008, Tilman Schmidt wrote: >> FWIW, it's still confusing to have an option "Enhanced Real Time >> Clock Support" under "Character Devices", then later an option >> "Real Time Clock" one level higher, none of the two in any way >> acknowledging the existence of the other one, and only after >> naively selecting both, you are told that there is some sort of >> conflict. >=20 > You mean "still, after applying that patch I sent"? No, I was referring to the situation still existing in current mainline. My comment was intended to be in support of your patches. Sorry for not having made myself clear. Regards, Tilman --------------enig79772E66E538CF11D4966586 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH7jw0Q3+did9BuFsRAgTgAKCU983VTGPndgbH7E0Xmrvn1sO9dgCfWKGe x5m6KO2Mey+JgSuNCwxhi+o= =E/FI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig79772E66E538CF11D4966586-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/