Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S289278AbSANXRY>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:17:24 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S289283AbSANXRQ>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:17:16 -0500
Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:57531 "EHLO
	vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S289282AbSANXPo>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:15:44 -0500
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:15:27 -0700
Message-Id: <200201142315.g0ENFRP00696@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>
From: Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>
To: esr@thyrsus.com
Cc: Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Penelope builds a kernel
In-Reply-To: <20020114174523.E23081@thyrsus.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020114165909.A20808@thyrsus.com>
	<200201142244.g0EMimd32377@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>
	<20020114174523.E23081@thyrsus.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Eric S. Raymond writes:
> Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>:
> > You know, I'm not really interested in whether Melvin or Penelope get
> > a root or not, and it's never occurred to me that kernel design should
> > be based on that.
> 
> The phrase "get a root" is entertainingly ambiguous in this context,
> is it not?

Not to an Australian. It's quite unambiguous :->

				Regards,

					Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current:   rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/