Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753999AbYC3UAn (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:00:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752793AbYC3UAe (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:00:34 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:41754 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752632AbYC3UAd (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:00:33 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:59:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Chr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: The never ending BEEEEP/__smp_call_function_mask with 2.6.25-rc7 In-Reply-To: <200803302125.10817.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: References: <200803302109.22219.chunkeey@web.de> <200803302125.10817.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 881 Lines: 23 On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > So. take a look at stuck_task... that's best backtrace I could get... > > (I have other logs too. (Task-list / Lockdep / ... ) but it's too much > > and I hope the _logs_ are already enough. > > > > BTW: I noticed that the clock seems to jump forward and backwards. > > Is this because the CPU-Cores aren't syncronized? (And why are they > > out of sync?) The cores of those AMD beasts are never in sync. That's a chip feature :) Can you please provide the output of: /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource for both 2.6.24 and 2.6.25-rc7 Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/