Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:20:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:19:59 -0500 Received: from pcow029o.blueyonder.co.uk ([195.188.53.123]:62219 "EHLO blueyonder.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:19:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:22:47 +0000 From: Ian Molton To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Hardwired drivers are going away? Message-Id: <20020114232247.195bf441.spyro@armlinux.org> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20020114205124.2f05fc56.spyro@armlinux.org> Reply-To: spyro@armlinux.org Organization: The dragon roost X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; ) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On a sunny Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:11:48 -0800 (PST) David Lang gathered a sheaf of electrons and etched in their motions the following immortal words: > the impact is in all calls to the module, if they are far calls instead > of near calls each and every call is (a hair) slower. > > so the code can be the same and still be slower to get to. > > you can argue that it's not enough slower to matter, but even Alan admits > there is some impact. Ok, #1 please dont send me courtesy copies without indicating so. #2 Not all architectures have a problem with 'far' or 'near' calls, and frankly, I'm glad the kernels design isnt being crippled just to serve the fundamentally CRAP x86 architecture, for once. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/