Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:39:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:39:05 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:15888 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:38:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 00:38:45 +0100 (CET) From: Dave Jones To: Erik Andersen Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , lkml Subject: Re: radeonfb fix, fixed In-Reply-To: <20020114031420.GA18525@codepoet.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: Content-Disposition: INLINE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Erik Andersen wrote: > > This patch is needed to make radeonfb compile and work. > > It is based on an earlier patch on the list attributed to > > Ani Joshi, plus adds the needed devinit fix. > Oops. That patch had some crap in it. Lets try that again. Uncompressed, that patch was just 4kb. When not too big, it's considered acceptable (and preferred) to send them as plaintext to the list for ease of quoting. Patch looks ok, but this bit.. diff -urN linux/drivers/video.virgin/radeonfb.c linux/drivers/video/radeonfb.c --- linux/drivers/video.virgin/radeonfb.c Sun Jan 13 19:09:54 2002 +++ linux/drivers/video/radeonfb.c Sun Jan 13 19:41:00 2002 @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ name: "radeonfb", id_table: radeonfb_pci_table, probe: radeonfb_pci_register, - remove: radeonfb_pci_unregister, + remove: __devexit_p(radeonfb_pci_unregister), }; Is that really needed ? Hotplugable radeons ? Dave. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/