Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755201AbYCaLjn (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:39:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752447AbYCaLjh (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:39:37 -0400 Received: from phunq.net ([64.81.85.152]:51900 "EHLO moonbase.phunq.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751986AbYCaLjg (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:39:36 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:39:14 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: david@lang.hm, David Newall , Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200803092346.17556.phillips@phunq.net> <200803180233.10156.phillips@phunq.net> <20080318135725.425f63df@core> In-Reply-To: <20080318135725.425f63df@core> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803310439.14978.phillips@phunq.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1533 Lines: 35 On Tuesday 18 March 2008 06:57, Alan Cox wrote: > > If the primary server goes down then we lose exactly one interesting > > data element stored only in its memory: the ramdisk dirty map. Though > > we could be much cleverer, the backup server will simply set its entire > > map to dirty when it takes over, and will duly sync back the entire > > ramdisk to media a few minutes later. > > Assuming the 1010 has proper power isolation that makes sense and would > give you pretty much what was wanted. Especially as you can replace the > secondary server with a small system which does *nothing* but sync the > ramdisk back and so is far less likely to crash. The 1010 just has power rails that connect to dual power supplies if that is what you mean. > Does make you wonder why its not built into the violin ;) Perhaps adding what amounts to a server motherboard did not make sense, when an external server can already do the job. I don't know, there is a certain purity in the JBOM concept (just a box of memory), and no doubt they were able to bring this beast to market earlier because of it. I would be far from surprised to see a later incarnation incorporate a hard disk. Did I mention it already has Linux running inside it to do the raid management etc? Regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/