Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:27:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:27:26 -0500 Received: from waste.org ([209.173.204.2]:37535 "EHLO waste.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:27:13 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:26:54 -0600 (CST) From: Oliver Xymoron To: Andreas Dilger cc: Theodore Tso , Juan Quintela , Greg KH , , , Subject: Re: [RFC] klibc requirements, round 2 In-Reply-To: <20020114165849.B26688@lynx.adilger.int> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Actually, the whole point of Juan's suggestion was that you _don't_ want > to fsck a filesystem that is currently mounted. There is always a > potential problem that fsck will change the on-disk data of the filesystem > in a way that is not coherent with what the kernel has in-memory, which > should force a system reboot before continuing (which most initscripts > don't do). For ext2/ext3 this may be relatively safe (data/metadata don't > move around much), but reiserfsck cannot (or will not) fsck a mounted > filesystem at all. Interesting point. Modulo any existing LVM brokenness, we can do this with a read-only snapshot and pivot_root afterwards. Alternately, a read-only /bootsupport or something of the sort which contains *fsck. What we don't want is initramfs to get big. -- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/