Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:45:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:45:10 -0500 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:3589 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:44:51 -0500 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:50:41 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Ed Tomlinson cc: Ingo Molnar , lkml , Dave Jones Subject: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler-H6/H7 and nice +19 In-Reply-To: <20020115013732.384A6BB346@oscar.casa.dyndns.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > On January 13, 2002 10:45 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > With pre3+H7, kernel compiles still take 40% longer with a setiathome > > > process running at nice +19. This is _not_ the case with the old > > > scheduler. > > > > Did you try to set MIN_TIMESLICE to 10 ( sched.h ) ?make bzImage with setiathome running nice +19 > > This makes things a worst - note the decreased cpu utilizaton... > > make bzImage 424.33s user 32.21s system 48% cpu 15:48.69 total > > What is this telling us? Doh ! Did you set this ? #define MIN_TIMESLICE (10 * HZ / 1000) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/