Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:18:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:18:48 -0500 Received: from tomts13.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.34]:31437 "EHLO tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:18:38 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Ed Tomlinson Organization: me To: Davide Libenzi Subject: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler-H6/H7 and nice +19 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:18:36 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Ingo Molnar , lkml , Dave Jones In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20020115021837.4A63969E@oscar.casa.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On January 14, 2002 08:50 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > On January 13, 2002 10:45 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > > With pre3+H7, kernel compiles still take 40% longer with a setiathome > > > > process running at nice +19. This is _not_ the case with the old > > > > scheduler. > > > > > > Did you try to set MIN_TIMESLICE to 10 ( sched.h ) ?make bzImage with > > > setiathome running nice +19 > > > > This makes things a worst - note the decreased cpu utilizaton... > > > > make bzImage 424.33s user 32.21s system 48% cpu 15:48.69 total > > > > What is this telling us? > > Doh ! > Did you set this ? > > #define MIN_TIMESLICE (10 * HZ / 1000) I set: #define MIN_TIMESLICE 10 Now I am tring #define MIN_TIMESLICE 1 which, looksing at monitors, gives about 80% cpu to the compile Ed Tomlinson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/