Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755504AbYFAVcV (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 17:32:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752359AbYFAVcN (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 17:32:13 -0400 Received: from sous-sol.org ([216.99.217.87]:53487 "EHLO sous-sol.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751908AbYFAVcN (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 17:32:13 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:31:39 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Thorsten Knabe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike Subject: Re: [BUG] Linux 2.6.25.4 task_struct leak Message-ID: <20080601213134.GJ4018@sequoia.sous-sol.org> References: <483EC624.90503@thorsten-knabe.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <483EC624.90503@thorsten-knabe.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 650 Lines: 17 (Cc: Jeff) * Thorsten Knabe (linux@thorsten-knabe.de) wrote: > [5.] Most recent kernel version which did not have the bug: > 2.6.23.17 does not leak task_structs. > 2.6.24 - 2.6.25.3 has not been tested Would you be able bisect this (or even just narrow it down a bit)? > Running 2.6.23.16 i386 UML on a 2.6.25.4 i386 host does NOT leak > task_structs. > Running 64-bit UML guests has not been tested. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/