From: hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support 
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
       Phillip Lougher <phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk>,
       David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
In-Reply-To: <200806012349.29538.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <200805311737.58991.arnd@arndb.de> <48421D65.8040301@lougher.demon.co.uk> <20080601122818.GA3687@shareable.org> <200806012349.29538.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:48:22 +0900
Message-ID: <9785.1212374902@jrobl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 800
Lines: 23


Arnd Bergmann:
> Besides, there are a many more problems with unionfs, which have
> all been mentioned in the previous review cycles. Aufs doesn't
> address those either AFAIK, with the exception of at least
> not making additional copies in the page cache when writing to
> a file.

Hello Arnd,

While I don't have particular objection to your idea and approach to
cramfs, I'd point out that modern LiveCDs tend to save their
modifications to disk.
And AUFS did address all known problems. If there left something, please
let me know.


Junjiro Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/