Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 05:46:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 05:46:03 -0500 Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]:31144 "EHLO waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 05:45:47 -0500 Message-Id: <200201151045.g0FAjduU002847@tigger.cs.uni-dortmund.de> To: David Lang cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Hardwired drivers are going away? In-Reply-To: Message from David Lang of "Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:57:19 PST." Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:45:39 +0100 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > > 1. security, if you don't need any modules you can disable modules > > > entirly and then it's impossible to add a module without patching > > > the kernel first (the module load system calls aren't there) > > Urban legend. > If this is the case then why do I get systemcall undefined error messages > when I make a mistake and attempt to load a module on a kernel without > modules enabled? AFAIU the security improvement of no-modules are way overrated. [...] > > > 3. simplicity in building kernels for other machines. with a monolithic > > > kernel you have one file to move (and a bootloader to run) with modules > > > you have to move quite a few more files. > > tar or nfs mount; make modules_install. > not on my firewalls thank you. You keep compilers and stuff on your firewalls then?! I get them over via ssh or by floppy/CD. Same idea. -- Horst von Brand http://counter.li.org # 22616 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/