Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753761AbYFBRrO (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:47:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751927AbYFBRq5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:46:57 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.183]:62797 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751930AbYFBRq4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:46:56 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 19:42:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp, Jamie Lokier , Phillip Lougher , David Newall , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de References: <200805311737.58991.arnd@arndb.de> <200806021315.41211.arnd@arndb.de> <20080602145404.GA22400@2ka.mipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080602145404.GA22400@2ka.mipt.ru> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?iso-8859-1?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60?= =?iso-8859-1?q?Y=2Ea=5E3zb?=) =?iso-8859-1?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5C?= =?iso-8859-1?q?wg=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200806021942.24750.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/9VcLCUxIftx5GDN9ySJqEeL3mrIgZRGrpdYg SEK/Ns1ERh8QMTVrXFj7Fvo91O8JG3u4wah9Biy2zIALDGRYCF GyH56WzRweXTOoLpENVGQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 843 Lines: 18 On Monday 02 June 2008, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > I personally think that a policy other than writing to the top is crazy > > enough, but randomly writing to multiple places is much worse, as it > > becomes unpredictable what the file system does, not just unexpected. > > Is this a double rot13 encoded "people will never use computers with > more than 640 kb of ram" phrase? :) No, it's more the "people don't need variable block size drives" argument. They've been working fine for decades on mainframes, are incredibly complicated to build and entirely pointless in practice ;-) Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/