Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 05:57:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 05:57:14 -0500 Received: from i030-063.nv.iinet.net.au ([203.59.30.63]:62962 "HELO aeonline.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 05:56:58 -0500 From: crispin@iinet.net.au Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:13:05 +0800 To: Horst von Brand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Hardwired drivers are going away? Message-ID: <20020115191305.P1928@earth> In-Reply-To: <200201151045.g0FAjduU002847@tigger.cs.uni-dortmund.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200201151045.g0FAjduU002847@tigger.cs.uni-dortmund.de>; from brand@jupiter.cs.uni-dortmund.de on Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:45:39AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:45:39AM +0100, Horst von Brand wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > 1. security, if you don't need any modules you can disable modules > > > > entirly and then it's impossible to add a module without patching > > > > the kernel first (the module load system calls aren't there) > > > > Urban legend. > > > If this is the case then why do I get systemcall undefined error messages > > when I make a mistake and attempt to load a module on a kernel without > > modules enabled? > > AFAIU the security improvement of no-modules are way overrated. insmod knark.o Crispin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/