Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753683AbYFCQIP (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:08:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752444AbYFCQH6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:07:58 -0400 Received: from panic.printk.net ([217.147.83.20]:46165 "EHLO panic.printk.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752269AbYFCQH6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:07:58 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1141 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:07:58 EDT Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] disable broadcomm legacy boot interrupt generation From: Jon Masters To: Olaf Dabrunz Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Assmann In-Reply-To: <20080603155914.GC16200@suse.de> References: <12124107071847-git-send-email-od@suse.de> <12124107072891-git-send-email-od@suse.de> <1212508003.22357.8.camel@londonpacket.bos.redhat.com> <20080603155914.GC16200@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:05:43 -0400 Message-Id: <1212509143.22357.23.camel@londonpacket.bos.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-4.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1285 Lines: 33 On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 17:59 +0200, Olaf Dabrunz wrote: > On 03-Jun-08, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 14:45 +0200, Olaf Dabrunz wrote: > > > > > Add a quirk to disable legacy boot interrupt generation on broadcomm HT1000. > > > > This one interests me, because I got access to the Broadcom HT-1000 > > datasheet and could not find this feature mentioned in there. I'd > > appreciate knowing how you figured this one out :) > > I had a sharp look at it... ;) Me too. It's ***NOT*** mentioned in there :) > Actually, I looked through the datasheet three times, and did not find > anything. Then I looked at the IRQ routing picture until I had an idea > of how it is supposed to work and the solution was becoming clear. The > register descriptions made me believe it could work, and testing > confirmed this. Oh, ok, now that takes some inordinate amount of dedication (on the level of commitable...I mean dude, WTF? :P). Someone should call the LHC and let them know you've got a way to detect the undetectable. Jon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/