Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:06:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:05:51 -0500 Received: from pc40.e18.physik.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.154.153]:21416 "EHLO pc40.e18.physik.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:05:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:05:37 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Kuhn To: Subject: How can a SIGKILL'ed process make progress? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi folks! Selling the drive to a friend I did a 'time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdc &' to erase it. Just out of curiosity I started 'fdisk -l /dev/hdc' while the dd was going on. As expected this told me there was no valid partition table, but then stopped in D state. I sent it a SIGKILL, started top and was a bit puzzled: fdisk was running from time to time and consuming an average of 5% CPU time. The SIGKILL actually happened only after the the dd was finished. Is this the expected behaviour for kernel 2.2.18 (SuSE 7.1 boot CD)? My understanding was that fdisk should be hit by SIGKILL the next time it gets a time slice... TIA, Roland main(int k,char**p){char*q=p[2];float i,j,r,x,y,a=*q++/4;for(y=a;--y>- a;puts(""))for(x=0;x++<*q;putchar(p[1][k%9]))for(i=k=r=0;j=r*r-i*i+(x/ *q*q[2]-q[1])/40,i=2*r*i+y/q[3],j*j+i*i<11&&++k<99;r=j);} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/