Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:03:46 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com, menage@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask()
 and update_nodemask()
Message-Id: <20080603150346.4611b5ab.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <4843AFC9.7000100@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <4843AFC9.7000100@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 773
Lines: 20

On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:31:05 +0800
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> extract two functions from update_cpumask() and update_nodemask().They will be
> used later for updating tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE
> offline/online.

Unfortunately this patch conflicts with
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cpusets-fix-bug-when-adding-nonexistent-cpu-or-mem.patch

Please check that the patch which I merged still makes sense.  ie: that
we did not revert the effects of that bugfix.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/