Message-ID: <4845F742.2070301@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:00:34 +0800
From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reply-To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       pj@sgi.com, menage@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask()
 and update_nodemask()
References: <4843AFC9.7000100@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080603150346.4611b5ab.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4845E80F.5000808@cn.fujitsu.com>
In-Reply-To: <4845E80F.5000808@cn.fujitsu.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1047
Lines: 26

on 2008-6-4 8:55 Li Zefan wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:31:05 +0800
>> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>>> extract two functions from update_cpumask() and update_nodemask().They will be
>>> used later for updating tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE
>>> offline/online.
>> Unfortunately this patch conflicts with
>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cpusets-fix-bug-when-adding-nonexistent-cpu-or-mem.patch
>>
>> Please check that the patch which I merged still makes sense.  ie: that
>> we did not revert the effects of that bugfix.
>>
> 
> They are fixing 2 different bugs, so they are irrelated, but unfortunately conflict in
> the code due to Miao's first patch which does code restructuring.
> 

Right. I will modify my patches.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/