Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:11:08 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com,
       menage@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask()
 and update_nodemask()
Message-Id: <20080603191108.1c35d3c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <4845F742.2070301@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <4843AFC9.7000100@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20080603150346.4611b5ab.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<4845E80F.5000808@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<4845F742.2070301@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1192
Lines: 29

On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:00:34 +0800 Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> on 2008-6-4 8:55 Li Zefan wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:31:05 +0800
> >> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> extract two functions from update_cpumask() and update_nodemask().They will be
> >>> used later for updating tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE
> >>> offline/online.
> >> Unfortunately this patch conflicts with
> >> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cpusets-fix-bug-when-adding-nonexistent-cpu-or-mem.patch
> >>
> >> Please check that the patch which I merged still makes sense.  ie: that
> >> we did not revert the effects of that bugfix.
> >>
> > 
> > They are fixing 2 different bugs, so they are irrelated, but unfortunately conflict in
> > the code due to Miao's first patch which does code restructuring.
> > 
> 
> Right. I will modify my patches.

I already did that, didn't I?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/