Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756722AbYFDCSc (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:18:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751279AbYFDCSY (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:18:24 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:55811 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751005AbYFDCSX (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:18:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4845FB18.5000002@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:16:56 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com, menage@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask() References: <4843AFC9.7000100@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080603150346.4611b5ab.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4845E80F.5000808@cn.fujitsu.com> <4845F742.2070301@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080603191108.1c35d3c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080603191108.1c35d3c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1396 Lines: 36 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:00:34 +0800 Miao Xie wrote: > >> on 2008-6-4 8:55 Li Zefan wrote: >>> Andrew Morton wrote: >>>> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:31:05 +0800 >>>> Miao Xie wrote: >>>> >>>>> extract two functions from update_cpumask() and update_nodemask().They will be >>>>> used later for updating tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE >>>>> offline/online. >>>> Unfortunately this patch conflicts with >>>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cpusets-fix-bug-when-adding-nonexistent-cpu-or-mem.patch >>>> >>>> Please check that the patch which I merged still makes sense. ie: that >>>> we did not revert the effects of that bugfix. >>>> >>> They are fixing 2 different bugs, so they are irrelated, but unfortunately conflict in >>> the code due to Miao's first patch which does code restructuring. >>> >> Right. I will modify my patches. > > I already did that, didn't I? > Oh, I just had a look at that, and yes you did that, but in a wrong way. :( You reverted the effects of this bugfix: cpusets-fix-bug-when-adding-nonexistent-cpu-or-mem.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/