Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:00:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:00:34 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:1031 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:00:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:00:18 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Klaus Meyer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: highmem=system killer, 2.2.17=performance killer ? Message-Id: <20020115160018.18793569.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <3C439E6D.B2B8C5B8@m3its.de> In-Reply-To: <3C439E6D.B2B8C5B8@m3its.de> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 04:13:49 +0100 Klaus Meyer wrote: > i've got serious problems using 2.4.x kernels using highmem support. > It seems to me that i'm not the only one, but the difference to most > other ones is, > that i can't use highmem because the system performance is terrible > slow. > > the testbed: > 1) Asus CUR-DLS (Server Set LE III) with two 1Ghz Pentiums, 2GB of ram Interestingly I have about the same setup and use, only I transfer about 25 GB a day via nfs to an Asus CUV4XD with 2 GB under 2.4.18-pre3 and do not experience any problem so far. I haven't had any with 2.4.17, too. Cache is pretty heavy used, but I experience no slowdown or other weird things. Can this be somehow chipset related? Maybe something about the DGE cards? I am using TP 100MBit tulip-based. Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/