Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:38:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:38:39 -0500 Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]:16859 "EHLO mons.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:38:30 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Trond Myklebust Organization: Dept. of Physics, University of Oslo To: Nikita Danilov Subject: Re: [BUG] symlink problem with knfsd and reiserfs Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:38:05 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: Nikita Danilov , Neil Brown , Hans-Peter Jansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Reiserfs mail-list , "David L. Parsley" In-Reply-To: <20020115115019.89B55143B@shrek.lisa.de> <15428.12621.682479.589568@charged.uio.no> <15428.19063.859280.833041@laputa.namesys.com> In-Reply-To: <15428.19063.859280.833041@laputa.namesys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 15. January 2002 16:27, Nikita Danilov wrote: > In reiserfs there is no static inode table, so we keep global generation > counter in a super block which is incremented on each inode deletion, > this generation is stored in the new inodes. Not that good as per-inode > generation, but we cannot do better without changing disk format. Am I right in assuming that you therefore cannot check that the filehandle is stale if the client presents you with the filehandle of the 'old' inode (prior to deletion)? However if the client compares the 'old' and 'new' filehandle, it will find them to be different? Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/