Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760644AbYFDM1j (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:27:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751725AbYFDM13 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:27:29 -0400 Received: from rtsoft3.corbina.net ([85.21.88.6]:20276 "EHLO buildserver.ru.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751456AbYFDM12 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:27:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:27:25 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Andrew Morton , sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, wim@iguana.be, scottwood@freescale.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8 v4] mpc83xx_wdt rework, support for mpc8610 and mpc8xx Message-ID: <20080604122725.GB2281@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com References: <20080602173726.GA24556@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20080603164830.32457962.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080604001739.GB24548@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20080603173214.0bf71571.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <18502.5368.786188.835122@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18502.5368.786188.835122@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2306 Lines: 53 On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:07:20PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Andrew Morton writes: > > > On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:17:39 +0400 > > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > > > > Please put the subsystem identifier (eg, "watchdog" and "powerpc") > > > > outside the [], for reasons which should be in > > > > Documentation/SubmittingPatches, which used to be there but which got > > > > lost. Bascially the text inside [] is for temporary not-for-committing > > > > information such as "rfc", "2.6.24-rc4", "resend", etc and should be stripped > > > > by the email recipient before merging. > > > > > > Yeah, I know. It is just hard to remember all the preferences. > > > > > > For example, PowerPC maintainers asking to do patches with "[POWERPC]" > > > identifier, this identifier purposely keeps intact for git-log. > > > > Addition of "[powerpc]" if it was absent can be scripted. > > > > However, the retaining of "[powerpc]" (etc) while not retaining "[rfc]" > > (etc) is not practical. > > > > Plus putting things into git with "[powerpc]" in the title is wrong. > > The chances are good that anyone who is taking such a patch off the > > git-commits list (say, for a backport) will lose that part of the > > title. It should be "powerpc: " > > I think Anton is confusing two things: I found original email.. yes, you indeed ask for [POWERPC] in git trees. But. I believe anyone who send patches, tries to mimic existing practice, and thus please the maintainer. Personally, I'm doing git log subsystem/ and looking for the preferred format for the commit message. And I'm not alone: linuxppc-dev is full of [POWERPC] in the patch subjects, despite the fact that you didn't explicitly ask for it. Asking to send patches with "subsystem: " and then seeing them as "[SUBSYSTEM] " in git-log is more confusing. Since new authors will personalize this thinking: "Oh, maintainer fixed my negligence. Next time I should send a patch with [SUBSYSTEM]". -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/