Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755550AbYFDNe1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:34:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751737AbYFDNeT (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:34:19 -0400 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.239]:18734 "EHLO hu-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750814AbYFDNeS (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:34:18 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=glQniq7pYH/MkJGrSpsPlSKus+kKybQE7sthosnas/bV6JshBWGntFAl21UiasRowy 6uNFuFKS7abUxVNtR6i105oJdFx2godtrpOtAENJn36MCEpLC0PEMdMkDyrCnZ8c+KiA q0U/Ub4f8zjeU/H02ozOjrs0coQ0v90iHVONg= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:34:16 +0200 From: "Michael Kerrisk" To: "Miklos Szeredi" Subject: Re: [patch 0/4 v2] vfs: fix utimensat() non-conformances to spec Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jamie@shareable.org, drepper@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <484694C1.7030603@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1469 Lines: 34 On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> This patch series is a revised version of the patch series >> that I sent yesterday to fix various utimensat() >> non-conformances. Patches 1 and 2 are unchanged (and were >> Acked by Miklos); patches 3 and 4 are revised following >> comments by Miklos. >> >> As requested I've split the original patch >> ("utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (patch)"; >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/24325 ) >> into four parts. Ideally, these should be applied for >> 2.6.26-rc, for the reasons outlined in my earlier mail >> "utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (test results)", >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/689411/ . >> >> The four patches can be applied independently, except that >> patch 3 needs patch 2 to be applied first. > > ACK for all four patches. > > In patch 3/4 the indentation of that big "if" looks really horribly > broken, but it will be cleaned out completely, so I won't complain... Aargh -- true, I messed up the indentation! -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/