Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:15:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:15:32 -0500 Received: from [216.151.155.108] ([216.151.155.108]:44299 "EHLO varsoon.denali.to") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:15:28 -0500 To: David Lang Cc: Felix von Leitner , "Albert D. Cahalan" , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andersen@codepoet.org Subject: Re: [RFC] klibc requirements In-Reply-To: From: Doug McNaught Date: 15 Jan 2002 11:15:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: David Lang's message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2002 06:54:46 -0800 (PST)" Message-ID: Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) Emacs/20.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Lang writes: > as an example (not for the boot process, but an example of a replacement > libc use) I use the firewall toolkit, it has been around for a _loooong_ > time (in software terms anyway) and has a firly odd licence (free for you > to use, source available, cannot sell it) which is not compatable with the > GPL. with glibc staticly linked this makes huge binaries, with libc5 they > were a lot smaller. I would like to try to use this small libc for these > proxies, but if the library is GPL, not LGPL I'm not allowed to. Hmm, I think you can; you just can't redistribute it. Can you even redistribute fwtk on non-commercial terms? -Doug -- Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees. --T. J. Jackson, 1863 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/