Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762070AbYFDTiP (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:38:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759695AbYFDTh6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:37:58 -0400 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:45158 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758602AbYFDTh5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:37:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:37:43 -0500 From: Paul Jackson To: Max Krasnyansky Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, ioe-lkml@rameria.de, sivanich@sgi.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@kolivas.org, dfults@sgi.com, devik@cdi.cz, dino@in.ibm.com, emmanuel.pacaud@univ-poitiers.fr, deweerdt@free.fr, mingo@elte.hu, colpatch@us.ibm.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, rostedt@goodmis.org, oleg@tv-sign.ru, paulmck@us.ibm.com, menage@google.com, rddunlap@osdl.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses) Message-Id: <20080604143743.b492c411.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <4846ED88.6040100@qualcomm.com> References: <20080601213019.14ea8ef8.pj@sgi.com> <1212446707.6269.26.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <48447C75.8040203@qualcomm.com> <200806030156.00155.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> <4844BB41.7000605@qualcomm.com> <4845D825.6000403@qualcomm.com> <20080603194148.56dfebe1.pj@sgi.com> <48461ADA.8020303@qualcomm.com> <877id5v1fg.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20080604124126.0d281a99.pj@sgi.com> <4846DF25.4020300@qualcomm.com> <20080604135826.f50f913a.pj@sgi.com> <4846ED88.6040100@qualcomm.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 737 Lines: 18 > btw Are you guys using some kind of castrated, statically linked shell to run > that script ? It (that init= program) is not a script. It is its own castrated, statically linked special purpose binary. Once it has done its duty setting up cpusets, it then exec's the normal init, confined to the cpuset configured for it. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/