Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 03:28:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 03:28:32 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-195-162-81.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.195.162.81]:64526 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 03:28:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 23:58:02 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Hedrick To: Alexander Viro cc: Ion Badulescu , Guest section DW , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext2 filesystem corruptions back from dead? 2.4.0-test11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: > I don't see any attempts to tag you (or ATA subsystem, for that matter) > in that thread. And thread is hardly bogus... I agree that changes in We agree that the "thread" is valid, trust that point. There was a quick pointed question that present, "Is it an IDE disk?" to paraphase the statement. > drivers/ide/* are very unlikely to be the source of that, but information > of that kind can help to weed out some of the changes in ll_rw_blk.c. What may be even more helpful is when I get arround to making an option, for some outstanding patches for 2.5, that would allow for user-space pattern pushing through the driver that gets properly inserted in to the list/buffer-head to make it pass through the block layer. This kind of testing will allow for nibble level tracing through everything, I hope. Cheers, Andre Hedrick CTO Timpanogas Research Group EVP Linux Development, TRG Linux ATA Development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/