Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:03:41 -0500
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: markh@compro.net
Cc: dmarkh@cfl.rr.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
       ioe-lkml@rameria.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@kolivas.org,
       dfults@sgi.com, devik@cdi.cz, sivanich@sgi.com, dino@in.ibm.com,
       emmanuel.pacaud@univ-poitiers.fr, deweerdt@free.fr, mingo@elte.hu,
       colpatch@us.ibm.com, maxk@qualcomm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
       oleg@tv-sign.ru, paulmck@us.ibm.com, menage@google.com,
       rddunlap@osdl.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may
 have realtime uses)
Message-Id: <20080604160341.7f8e5014.pj@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <48470250.6010803@compro.net>
References: <20080601213019.14ea8ef8.pj@sgi.com>
	<200806030035.58387.ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
	<1212446707.6269.26.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
	<200806031603.40731.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
	<48466745.5050802@cfl.rr.com>
	<20080604122644.cd73bfb9.pj@sgi.com>
	<48470250.6010803@compro.net>
Organization: SGI
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 788
Lines: 18

Mark wrote:
> Yes to both questions. However after reading Max and Peter's response, I
> guess there is another, probably better or _only_, way to get what I really
> need anyway so please don't consider my intrusion into this thread as a NAK.
> 
> I do not rely on this option as it is implemented. 

Thank-you for your clearly stated conclusions, and thanks for stopping by.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/