Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754901AbYFDVKY (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:10:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753036AbYFDVKH (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:10:07 -0400 Received: from mx2.compro.net ([216.54.166.4]:55945 "EHLO mx2.compro.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760675AbYFDVKD (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:10:03 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 575 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:10:03 EDT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,591,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="2304712" Message-ID: <48470250.6010803@compro.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:00:00 -0400 From: Mark Hounschell Reply-To: markh@compro.net Organization: Compro Computer Svcs. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Jackson CC: Mark Hounschell , nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, ioe-lkml@rameria.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@kolivas.org, dfults@sgi.com, devik@cdi.cz, sivanich@sgi.com, dino@in.ibm.com, emmanuel.pacaud@univ-poitiers.fr, deweerdt@free.fr, mingo@elte.hu, colpatch@us.ibm.com, maxk@qualcomm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, oleg@tv-sign.ru, paulmck@us.ibm.com, menage@google.com, rddunlap@osdl.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses) References: <20080601213019.14ea8ef8.pj@sgi.com> <200806030035.58387.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> <1212446707.6269.26.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <200806031603.40731.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <48466745.5050802@cfl.rr.com> <20080604122644.cd73bfb9.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080604122644.cd73bfb9.pj@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1005 Lines: 30 Paul Jackson wrote: > Mark wrote: >> What is an abonination, is that cpusets are equired for this type of >> isolation to begin with, even on a 2 processor machine. > > Just to be sure I'm following you here, you stating that you > want to be able to manipulate the isolated cpu map at runtime, > not just with the boot option isolcpus, right? > Where this > isolated cpu map works just fine even on systems which do > not have cpusets configured, right? > Yes to both questions. However after reading Max and Peter's response, I guess there is another, probably better or _only_, way to get what I really need anyway so please don't consider my intrusion into this thread as a NAK. I do not rely on this option as it is implemented. Regards Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/