Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757676AbYFEQoc (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:44:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753256AbYFEQoY (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:44:24 -0400 Received: from host36-195-149-62.serverdedicati.aruba.it ([62.149.195.36]:60382 "EHLO mx.cpushare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752653AbYFEQoX (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:44:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:44:21 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Jack Steiner , Robin Holt , Nick Piggin , Peter Zijlstra , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kanoj Sarcar , Roland Dreier , Steve Wise , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Avi Kivity , linux-mm@kvack.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins , Rusty Russell , Anthony Liguori , Chris Wright , Marcelo Tosatti , Eric Dumazet , "Paul E. McKenney" , Izik Eidus , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] mm_take_all_locks Message-ID: <20080605164421.GG15502@duo.random> References: <082f312bc6821733b1c3.1212680169@duo.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2662 Lines: 70 On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:15:41AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Just a small comment fix. > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > + /* > > + * AS_MM_ALL_LOCKS can't change from under us because > > + * we hold the global_mm_spinlock. > > There's no global_mm_spinlock, you mean the 'mm_all_locks_mutex'. > > (There was at least one other case where you had that comment issue). From: Andrea Arcangeli Indeed, I meant mm_all_locks_mutex, this will fix it, or if you prefer a resubmit of the 2/3 let me know. Thanks! Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli --- diff -r 082f312bc682 mm/mmap.c --- a/mm/mmap.c Thu Jun 05 17:30:17 2008 +0200 +++ b/mm/mmap.c Thu Jun 05 18:40:23 2008 +0200 @@ -2263,7 +2263,7 @@ static void vm_lock_anon_vma(struct anon if (!test_bit(0, (unsigned long *) &anon_vma->head.next)) { /* * The LSB of head.next can't change from under us - * because we hold the global_mm_spinlock. + * because we hold the mm_all_locks_mutex. */ spin_lock(&anon_vma->lock); /* @@ -2286,11 +2286,11 @@ static void vm_lock_mapping(struct addre if (!test_bit(AS_MM_ALL_LOCKS, &mapping->flags)) { /* * AS_MM_ALL_LOCKS can't change from under us because - * we hold the global_mm_spinlock. + * we hold the mm_all_locks_mutex. * * Operations on ->flags have to be atomic because * even if AS_MM_ALL_LOCKS is stable thanks to the - * global_mm_spinlock, there may be other cpus + * mm_all_locks_mutex, there may be other cpus * changing other bitflags in parallel to us. */ if (test_and_set_bit(AS_MM_ALL_LOCKS, &mapping->flags)) @@ -2362,7 +2362,7 @@ static void vm_unlock_anon_vma(struct an if (test_bit(0, (unsigned long *) &anon_vma->head.next)) { /* * The LSB of head.next can't change to 0 from under - * us because we hold the global_mm_spinlock. + * us because we hold the mm_all_locks_mutex. * * We must however clear the bitflag before unlocking * the vma so the users using the anon_vma->head will @@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ static void vm_unlock_mapping(struct add if (test_bit(AS_MM_ALL_LOCKS, &mapping->flags)) { /* * AS_MM_ALL_LOCKS can't change to 0 from under us - * because we hold the global_mm_spinlock. + * because we hold the mm_all_locks_mutex. */ spin_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock); if (!test_and_clear_bit(AS_MM_ALL_LOCKS, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/