Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:11:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:11:18 -0500 Received: from 64-30-107-48.ftth.sac.winfirst.net ([64.30.107.48]:34054 "EHLO leng.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:11:01 -0500 Message-ID: <0b8801c19df9$0784dd50$7e93a8c0@sac.unify.com> From: "Manuel McLure" To: , "Marco Colombo" Cc: "Thomas Duffy" , "Linux Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Aunt Tillie builds a kernel (was Re: ISA hardware discovery -- the elegant solution) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:15:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Red Hat provides a source RPM for their kernel - install the source RPM and use rpm to build it. If you want to figure out what order the patches were applied in, just look at the RPM spec file. I myself have applied patches to a Red Hat kernel RPM in this fashion. -- Manuel A. McLure KE6TAW | ...for in Ulthar, according to an ancient | and significant law, no man may kill a cat. | -- H.P. Lovecraft ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard B. Johnson" To: "Marco Colombo" Cc: "Thomas Duffy" ; "Linux Mailing List" Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:52 AM Subject: Re: Aunt Tillie builds a kernel (was Re: ISA hardware discovery -- the elegant solution) > On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Marco Colombo wrote: > > > On 15 Jan 2002, Thomas Duffy wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2002-01-15 at 04:29, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > > > > > > > - Building from source is good karma. > > [SNIPPED...] > > > > > Every distro supplies a package with the source used to build their own > > kernel. Just recomplile it. > > Really??? Have you ever tried this? RedHat provides a directory > of random patches that won't patch regardless of the order in > which you attempt patches (based upon date-stamps on patches or > date-stamps on files). It's like somebody just copied in some > junk, thinking nobody would ever bother. > > Some distributions don't even provide source. They provide > copies of /usr/src/linux/include/asm and /usr/src/linux/include/linux > but nothing else. You have to "find" source on the internet. > > Some distributions don't even provide that, instead they provide > copies of /usr/src/linux/include/linux and /usr/src/linux/include/asm > under /usr/include. > > The "good-ol-days" where you could get 72 floppies from Yggdrasil, > install Linux, and spend the next 48 hours watching it compile > are long gone. > > I have never found a distribution that uses modules, in which is > was even remotely possible to duplicate the kernel supplied. > > Cheers, > Dick Johnson > > Penguin : Linux version 2.4.1 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips). > > I was going to compile a list of innovations that could be > attributed to Microsoft. Once I realized that Ctrl-Alt-Del > was handled in the BIOS, I found that there aren't any. > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/