Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763506AbYFFHeO (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 03:34:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759693AbYFFHdq (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 03:33:46 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:32769 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756516AbYFFHdo (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 03:33:44 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:33:27 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5 Message-Id: <20080606003327.9ac0e91b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080606072536.GA19334@elte.hu> References: <20080605175217.cee497f3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080605195604.41623687.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080606071707.GB9708@elte.hu> <20080606072536.GA19334@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1334 Lines: 33 On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:25:36 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:52:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > I have created today's linux-next tree at > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git > > > > > > Instantly oopses on two x86_64 boxes with this config: > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-akpm2.txt > > > > > > oops: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/p6056454.jpg > > > > > > At a guess I'd say the sched_domains code is calling into slab before > > > slab is initalised. Something like that. > > > > did SLUB change in linux-next? There is no such problem in -tip. > > i just successfully booted your config on 4 separate 64-bit test-systems > with latest -tip. (two dual-core boxes, a quad and a 16way box) Latest > -tip includes sched-next and x86-next as well. What's the point in testing a radically differenet kernel from the one which is known to be crashing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/