Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764572AbYFFHsn (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 03:48:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754626AbYFFHse (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 03:48:34 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46180 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753842AbYFFHsd (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 03:48:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:47:43 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5 Message-Id: <20080606004743.a78180c3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080606074137.GA28962@elte.hu> References: <20080605175217.cee497f3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080605195604.41623687.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080606071707.GB9708@elte.hu> <20080606072536.GA19334@elte.hu> <20080606003327.9ac0e91b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080606074137.GA28962@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2156 Lines: 45 On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:41:37 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > did SLUB change in linux-next? There is no such problem in -tip. > > > > > > i just successfully booted your config on 4 separate 64-bit > > > test-systems with latest -tip. (two dual-core boxes, a quad and a > > > 16way box) Latest -tip includes sched-next and x86-next as well. > > > > What's the point in testing a radically differenet kernel from the one > > which is known to be crashing? > > well, you Cc:-ed me, so i wanted to exclude -tip's 750+ commits in this > area (scheduling, 64-bit x86) in the first step. > What's the relationship between -tip and linux-next? The crash seems to be due to sched_domains startup ordering, at a guess. My third bisect iteration has hit this: arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c: In function 'get_kmmio_probe': arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:85: error: implicit declaration of function 'list_for_each_entry_rcu' arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:85: error: 'list' undeclared (first use in this function) arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:85: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:85: error: for each function it appears in.) arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:85: error: syntax error before '{' token arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:88: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c: In function 'get_kmmio_fault_page': arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:100: error: 'list' undeclared (first use in this function) arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:100: error: syntax error before '{' token arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:103: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c: In function 'add_kmmio_fault_page': arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:328: error: implicit declaration of function 'list_add_rcu' arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c: In function 'remove_kmmio_fault_pages': arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:420: error: implicit declaration of function 'list_del_rcu' -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/