Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762465AbYFFIW2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:22:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753166AbYFFIWP (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:22:15 -0400 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:52639 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751267AbYFFIWM (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:22:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:22:06 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Andrew Morton Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5 Message-Id: <20080606182206.8bc36f71.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20080606010149.4d757b92.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080605175217.cee497f3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080605195604.41623687.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080606071707.GB9708@elte.hu> <20080606072536.GA19334@elte.hu> <20080606003327.9ac0e91b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080606074137.GA28962@elte.hu> <20080606004743.a78180c3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080606175358.a439d1bb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080606010149.4d757b92.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0rc (GTK+ 2.12.9; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__6_Jun_2008_18_22_06_+1000_3vgIWoBuzzSr00/U" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1758 Lines: 49 --Signature=_Fri__6_Jun_2008_18_22_06_+1000_3vgIWoBuzzSr00/U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andrew, On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:01:49 -0700 Andrew Morton = wrote: > > Well yes - I just bodged it by hand then unbodged it later. But we > have a bisection break there. Admittedly a minor one, unless the bug > you're bisecting for requires that kprobes be configured. But it would > be nice to squish it. >=20 > I hope Ingo isn't following this > once-you've-checked-it-in-you-can't-fix-it stupidity :( Its a break caused by the merge of the ftrace tree into the linux-next tree (because at the point I merge the ftrace tree, linux-next contains the rcu tree which has moves stuff into rculist.h), so logically that patch should become part of the merge commit. If it was part of the merge, you could never bisect to a point where you got this build breakage. Each tree is fine on its own if you go one step back from the merge. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Fri__6_Jun_2008_18_22_06_+1000_3vgIWoBuzzSr00/U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhI864ACgkQTgG2atn1QN+GzwCcDsddpCjLGZ/+JupcwRk3Kulm RmoAn3YKNPSQOrkX3XSGXfluJEODEQ5E =8Ux3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__6_Jun_2008_18_22_06_+1000_3vgIWoBuzzSr00/U-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/