Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:29:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:29:25 -0500 Received: from femail39.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.254.60.33]:11981 "EHLO femail39.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:29:12 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rob Landley To: Bruce Harada Subject: Re: Aunt Tillie builds a kernel (was Re: ISA hardware discovery -- the elegant solution) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:27:10 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020114125228.B14747@thyrsus.com> <20020114234129.MGOI23959.femail47.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> <20020115112239.25e713e0.bruce@ask.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20020115112239.25e713e0.bruce@ask.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20020115212910.QYNC7783.femail39.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 14 January 2002 09:22 pm, Bruce Harada wrote: > As for adding a driver that's not included in the vendor's kernel, do you > mean that having a Microsoft-trained drone rebuild a kernel specifically > for a certain PC (thus requiring further compilation for any hardware added > later) and including a no-doubt beta driver and then giving it to Aunt > Tillie without any testing beyond the MCSE's PC is a *good* idea? No, it would be tested on Aunt Tillie's PC, which she brought in for upgrading (she's not going to unscrew the case and put a new card in herself, is she), and which the drone has never seen before and didn't necessarily sell her in the first place. (Maybe if Aunt Tillie's lucky the store did, but this is the new guy and aunt tillie's had the PC for two years, they don't sell that model anymore...) I don't think having a microsoft-trained drone TOUCH a computer is a good idea. But SAIR and Linux+ are going to turn out their own drones with a "USDA approved" stamp on their forehead who are NOT hackers, and who intend to make a living off of glorified tech support. It happened in the mainframe world, it happened in the minicomputer world, it happened under DOS and Windows, and it'll happen under Linux. And nine to five workers are not actually a BAD thing. Very few actual hackers WANT to babysit database schema for Fortune 500 corporations... The "I summon the vast power of certification" crowd will always be with us. Would you rather that the hundreds of thousands of people who get a four year degree in computing every year (because they think there's money in it, not because they actually LIKE computers) work on windows boxes, or on Linux? (Hint: as long as they work on windows boxes, they and their bosses are paying money to microsoft, and they are enabling windows-only shops where employees send *.doc files to everybody they know, and advancing the dot-net flag.) You can't have total world domination without bringing along the drones. Hoping for a world where there ARE no drones is a utopian view. Hoping for a PLATFORM where there are no drones is easily achievable, it's called a "tiny niche market". The drones -ARE- the service industry through which you get aunt tillie. I just think Eric's skipping a step... Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/