Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20080608.071051.212882594.davem@davemloft.net>
To: w@1wt.eu
Cc: pupilla@hotmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
       chrisw@sous-sol.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080608123601.GB10491@1wt.eu>
References: <20080607204325.GJ5609@1wt.eu>
	<BAY103-DAV7370611E1B3FEA8FD69B9B2B10@phx.gbl>
	<20080608123601.GB10491@1wt.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1390
Lines: 33

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:36:01 +0200

> Indeed. Most likely it was simply lost somewhere in the e-mail chain.
> Then best thing to do is to retransmit it for next batch of patches.
> Chris, here's the fix in question.

It did not get lost at all, it's perfectly sitting in my
networking -stable queue waiting for me to have an
opportunity to submit it to the -stable folks after I do
some testing.

If you ask me in the future about the status of a -stable
patch from the networking, I'll let you know exactly what
is happening to that patch wrt. stable.  I rarely forget
to submit an appropriate patch, and when I do forget you
merely have to let me know (rather than submitting it
to -stable directly, please don't do that) so that I can
fit it in with what I plan to submit to -stable already.

Right now is an unusual situation where I am in a 3 week
period of near constant travel, otherwise all of this
stuff would have been submitted already.  As I stated in
another reply to you, that period is ending tomorrow so I
should be able to crank out all of these patches to -stable
some time this week.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/