Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757553AbYFHXkp (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:40:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754742AbYFHXkh (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:40:37 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:57666 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754732AbYFHXkg (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:40:36 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 16:39:26 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Andrew Morgan Cc: Dmitry Adamushko , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [ linus-git ] prctl(PR_SET_KEEPCAPS, ...) is broken for some configs, e.g. CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX Message-Id: <20080608163926.56f1be3d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <484C5E84.2020307@kernel.org> References: <1212932321.4675.9.camel@earth> <484BF662.9070100@kernel.org> <20080608110630.08a45cc6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <484C5E84.2020307@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1602 Lines: 38 On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:34:44 -0700 Andrew Morgan wrote: > | On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 08:10:26 -0700 Andrew Morgan > wrote: > | > |> Nacked-by: Andrew G. Morgan > |> > |> In a configuration in which you are not using capabilities, what is the > |> "keep capabilities" operation supposed to do? Lie to you? > |> > |> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10748 > | > | I totally agree with comment 11 there. Quite a number of people have > already > | hit this and more surely will. How can we help them (and hence us)? > > What do people think about comment #8 from Stephen Smalley?: > > The dummy module is generally in the untenable position of having to lie > to userspace or break the existing capability-related system call > interface. It should just go away, and make capability the default > module (w/ stubs for the rest of the LSM hooks as with dummy). Then > CONFIG_SECURITY=n will yield the same result as CONFIG_SECURITY=y w/o > any further options. (removed pgp crap, undid top-posting. Your emails are very hard to reply to) It's a fine comment, but I am not knowledgeable enough in this area to say whether it's a desirable thing to do for 2.6.26. I fear that nothing will happen, and we'll end up wasting a lot of peoples' time sending hey-why-did-my-dhcp-break reports. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/