Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755611AbYFIS41 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:56:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753469AbYFIS4T (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:56:19 -0400 Received: from styx.suse.cz ([82.119.242.94]:56019 "EHLO mail.suse.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753378AbYFIS4S (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:56:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [stable] Missing patch from stable [3/7] From: Miklos Szeredi To: Chris Wright Cc: Willy Tarreau , Christoph Hellwig , stable@kernel.org, Michael Halcrow , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080609171253.GI30402@sequoia.sous-sol.org> References: <20080608085923.GC6439@1wt.eu> <1212923462.4020.224.camel@tucsk> <20080608122920.GA10491@1wt.eu> <1212936622.4020.236.camel@tucsk> <20080609171253.GI30402@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:56:16 +0200 Message-Id: <1213037776.4020.274.camel@tucsk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1411 Lines: 36 On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:12 -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > * Miklos Szeredi (mszeredi@suse.cz) wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:29 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > Well, you know the implications of leaving these known bugs open more than > > > me. If you think some of them are really not needed, I'm fine with this, > > > but some definitely fix real bugs (judging by the code and the comments). > > > > Yeah. Perhaps there should also be a rule, that -stable patches for > > EXPERIMENTAL stuff (like ecryptfs) are automatically rejected. And then > > they wouldn't increase the workload for the people collecting/reviewing > > the stable series. > > Both users and distros enable code marked EXPERIMENTAL. It's not > that uncommon for code to get stuck in EXPERIMENTAL long after it's in > general use. OK, it's been voted down. While I do think that -stable updates for experimental stuff are not as important as for mainstream stuff, it's also true that it does little harm to include these fixes. The only harm is that lots of these non-critical patches drown out the really important ones, which get less attention this way. Oh, well... Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/